Constitutional Design

I. Democratic Constitution in South Africa

 A. Apartheid: Overview and Impact

  1. Definition: Apartheid was a system of racial discrimination enforced by white Europeans in South Africa from the 17th century.
  2. Categorization:
    • Individuals were classified by skin color, with whites deemed superior.
    • Non-whites (blacks, coloreds, and Indians) were treated as inferior.
  3. Denial of Rights:
    • Non-whites were denied voting rights.
    • They were barred from living in areas designated for whites.

B. Rise of Resistance

  1. Growth of Dissent: Resistance against apartheid began to escalate, especially from the 1950s onward.
  2. Key Players: The African National Congress (ANC) emerged as a leading force against apartheid.
  3. Nelson Mandela’s Trial:
    • In 1964, Mandela and eight leaders were tried for treason by the apartheid government.
    • Mandela was sentenced to life imprisonment for opposing the regime.

C. Transition to Democracy

  1. Government Realization: The apartheid government acknowledged that it could no longer suppress dissent through repression alone.
  2. Policy Changes:
    • Discriminatory laws were repealed.
    • The ban on political parties was lifted.
    • Media restrictions were relaxed.
  3. Key Milestones:
    • Nelson Mandela was released from Robben Island after 28 years.
    • On April 26, 1994, apartheid officially ended, leading to the establishment of a multi-racial government.

D. Drafting a New Constitution

  1. Collaborative Effort: Former oppressors and freedom struggle leaders united to draft a new constitution.
  2. Inclusive Rights: The new constitution granted extensive rights, emphasizing inclusivity and the importance of all voices in nation-building.

E. Importance of a Constitution

  1. Functionality:
    • Outlines how the government is formed and defines the distribution of power.
    • Sets limits on governmental authority and defines citizens’ rights.
    • Reflects the collective aspirations of the people for a just society.
  1. Universal Relevance:
    • All democratic countries possess constitutions that serve as foundational documents guiding governance and protecting citizens’ rights.

II. Making of the Indian Constitution

A. Historical Context

  1. Partition Trauma: The Indian Constitution emerged from the traumatic partition of India and Pakistan, which created significant challenges in integration.
  2. British Legacy: The British left it to princely states to decide whether to join India, Pakistan, or remain independent, complicating the process.

B. Consensus for Democracy

  1. Early Frameworks: A consensus on the vision of a democratic India existed, shaped during the freedom struggle:
    • 1928: Leaders like Motilal Nehru drafted constitutional frameworks.
    • 1931: The Karachi session of the Indian National Congress proposed key principles such as:
      • Universal Adult Franchise
      • Right to Freedom and Equality
      • Safeguards for minority rights.

C. The Constituent Assembly

  1. Formation: The Constituent Assembly was composed of elected representatives, with elections held in July 1946.
  2. Inaugural Session: The first session took place in December 1946.
  3. Post-Partition Division: The assembly was split into the Constituent Assemblies of India and Pakistan, with India’s assembly comprising 299 members.
  4. Adoption of the Constitution: The Constitution was formally adopted on November 26, 1949, and came into effect on January 26, 1950, celebrated as Republic Day.

D. Enduring Significance of the Constitution

  1. Broad Consensus: The Constitution reflects a broad consensus that is not merely a product of its members’ opinions.
  2. Representation: The Constituent Assembly was representative, reflecting the diversity and aspirations of the Indian populace.
  3. Rigorous Deliberation:
    • Fundamental principles were established, followed by a Drafting Committee led by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar preparing a draft Constitution.
    • Every clause underwent thorough deliberation, with over 2,000 amendments considered, ensuring comprehensive governance.

 

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top